CMM 2016-01 16

Source:
You are viewing a historical Obligation.
Status: Historical
Effective From
Effective Until
Supersedes
Advice and implementation of additional FAD set reduction choice during 2017
Full Text
16. Each CCM must select one of the following options listed below and notify the Secretariat of that selection by April 1, 2014 (footnote 3 )
a. The prohibition of setting on FADs shall be extended for an additional month, for a total of 4 months (July, August, September, and October). OR
b. In addition to the 3-month prohibition of setting on FADs the CCM shall limit the total number of FAD sets by its vessels to the number listed in column A in Attachment A (footnote 4)footnote 3: Purse seine vessels flagged to a developing coastal state member smaller than 50 m LOA (13+36=49 vessels currently on the WCPFC Record of Fishing Vessels) are exempted from this reduction requirement described in paragraphs 16 -18. When a SIDS CCM chooses limitation of annual FAD sets stipulated in paragraphs 16 -18, purse seine vessels newly introduced after January 1 2010 are managed outside of the FAD set limit for that CCM for 3 years following their introduction. After 3 years the FAD sets/total sets by those vessels shall be incorporated into the calculation of the baseline figure for that CCM. Those purse seine vessels exempted or managed outside the FAD set limit shall be notified to the Secretariat by 31 March 2014 or within 15 days of vessels introduced after this date.  Footnote 4: Throughout this measure, in the case of small purse seine fleets, of five vessels or less, the baseline level of effort used to determine a limit shall be the maximum effort in any period and not the average 
Theme
Additional measures for tropical tunas
Sub Theme
Purse seine fishery FAD set management
Category / CMR Section
Report Deadline
Report
Quantitative Limits: CCM-level and Collective
Implementation
No Evaluation Criteria Records
No CCM Limit Records
Category: Report Deadline
CMS Compliance History
When Evaluated:
2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017
Average Score:
59%
Likelihood of Non-Compliance:
Likely
Consequence of Risk Ratings
CCM or collective group Consequence of Non-Compliance Risk of Non-Compliance
Category: Report
CMS Compliance History
When Evaluated:
2013
Average Score:
89%
Likelihood of Non-Compliance:
Moderate
Consequence of Risk Ratings
CCM or collective group Consequence of Non-Compliance Risk of Non-Compliance
Category: Quantitative Limits: CCM-level and Collective
CMS Compliance History
When Evaluated:
2016, 2017
Average Score:
100%
Likelihood of Non-Compliance:
Rare
Consequence of Risk Ratings
CCM or collective group Consequence of Non-Compliance Risk of Non-Compliance
Category: Implementation
CMS Compliance History
When Evaluated:
2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017
Average Score:
96%
Likelihood of Non-Compliance:
Unlikely
Consequence of Risk Ratings
CCM or collective group Consequence of Non-Compliance Risk of Non-Compliance